Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hamid Reza Nadaf vs Luke Jacob Gamble Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nadaf vs Gamble analysis and find out who is favored!
Hamid Reza Nadaf vs Luke Jacob Gamble Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nadaf 2 - 0 Gamble
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nadaf has won 44.74% of points on their second serve, while Gamble has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nadaf, in recent form, has won 53.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gamble has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nadaf has saved 44.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gamble has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nadaf has won 40% of matches played (W/L 8/ 12), with Gamble winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nadaf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 24/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 35/ 58). Gamble has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 19/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 5/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Nadaf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 8/ 12), where as Gamble has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nadaf winning 2 times and Gamble being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nadaf winning 4 and Gamble winning 0. The last match between Nadaf and Gamble was at the Mozambique F2 (Maputo), 13-11-2018, First, Hard with Hamid Reza Nadaf getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nadaf and Gamble have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nadaf winning 0 times and Gamble 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nadaf winning 0, and Gamble 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nadaf has played against opponents with an average rank of 98.55 while Gamble has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nadaf has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gamble has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nadaf has converted 48.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gamble has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
873
Rank
803
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
43% (59-79)
Career Total W/L
45% (27-33)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Hamid Reza Nadaf vs Luke Jacob Gamble For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nadaf VS Gamble
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Hamid Reza Nadaf | Luke Jacob Gamble |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (68/113) | 62% (69/111) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (50/68) | 67% (46/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (31/45) | 48% (20/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (45/111) | 28% (32/113) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hamid Reza Nadaf | Luke Jacob Gamble |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (59/60) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 95.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (250/364) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (153/250) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (51/114) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (23/47) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (181/407) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hamid Reza Nadaf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gergely Madarasz
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
38
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matyas Fuele
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Sina Moghimi
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matyas Fuele
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Daniel Khazime
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Amirali Ghavam
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Luke Jacob Gamble Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Adamson
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Mora
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felipe Mantilla
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
8 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Svensson
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustav Hansson
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Jacob Gamble
Player
Almir Nokic
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(4) 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Jacob Gamble
Player
Simon Birgerson
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luke Jacob Gamble
Player
Oleg Khotkov
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
82%
(
32 of
39)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
42
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Nadaf Vs Gamble Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nadaf are available here and Gamble photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
